Message Bored

Red Hat · **Joined:** Mon Apr 21, 2003 7:15 pm **Posts:** 285

Works fine for me except when I go to my ethernet info.

michael savage · **Posted:** Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:08 am

Red Hat wrote:

This thread isn't, how is taking about computer parts stupid?

is that a serious question?

janine · **Posted:** Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:15 am

Quote:

is that a serious question?

is that.......?

<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v339/janine1983/wtff.jpg">

meh?

michael savage · **Posted:** Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:10 am

what do you think?

Red Hat · **Joined:** Mon Apr 21, 2003 7:15 pm **Posts:** 285

Holy crap, you still have a 600MHz Pentium 3 and Windows 98/2000/ME.

aDam · **Posted:** Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:29 pm

Don't knock 98! It's better than ME fo' sho'! 2000 and XP have their issues too. Windows has evolved very little since windows 98. The only considerable difference I can think of since then is NTFS which I believe has been around since windows NT was around the same time as 98.

And you should no assume such a screenshot is win 98 as when you can use the classic theme in XP to have the same look. That's what I use when I use XP which isn't really often but still whatever.

... but yeah that being said I know Janine runs windows 98. I feel the need to defend her computer though as I was on a similar system most of the time until I bought my current system some time earlier this year.

janine · **Posted:** Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:33 pm

Quote:

what do you think?

That pink looks good on me...

sorry, but seeing as I work maybe 20 hours a week at min wage, and am still in university, do not have money to go out and spend it on computer stuff

aDam · **Posted:** Mon Dec 06, 2004 8:05 pm

janine wrote:

That pink looks good on me...

Agreed!

I don't see why people need to constantly have new computers. If you game or something then you need it. I capture stuff so I needed something more. But unless your computer crashes for no reason all the time then... okay forget it...

The Ginchiest · **Posted:** Mon Dec 06, 2004 8:06 pm

Please reference any Fugazi record to understand why you are wrong.

Red Hat · **Joined:** Mon Apr 21, 2003 7:15 pm **Posts:** 285

aDam wrote:

Don't knock 98! It's better than ME fo' sho'! 2000 and XP have their issues too. Windows has evolved very little since windows 98. The only considerable difference I can think of since then is NTFS which I believe has been around since windows NT was around the same time as 98.

And you should no assume such a screenshot is win 98 as when you can use the classic theme in XP to have the same look. That's what I use when I use XP which isn't really often but still whatever.

... but yeah that being said I know Janine runs windows 98. I feel the need to defend her computer though as I was on a similar system most of the time until I bought my current system some time earlier this year.

Yeah Windows 98 is way better than Windows ME. Windows ME is buggy.

Doogan · **Joined:** Mon Nov 29, 2004 3:28 am **Posts:** 184

Red Hat · **Joined:** Mon Apr 21, 2003 7:15 pm **Posts:** 285

The michael savage person who posted in this thread was a dick to me... when I was a child... on the internet... lol

Right Now. When I get the money, I WILL upgrade. Things have changed so much over the years for the better and will keep changing.

OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-Bit + Ubuntu
Monitor: 21" Asus Wide-Screen Monitor
Motherboard: Asus Motherboard
Processer: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 2.7GHz
Memory: 4GB DDR2 RAM
Hard Drive: 1TB SATA HDD
Video/GFX Card: ATI Radeon 5570HD
Video/GFX Memory: 1GB
Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
TV Card: Hauppauge HD PVR

Message Bored

Computer Specs

Who is online