Message Bored

Jar Jarring News - Jar Jar Defended!
Page 1 of 1

Author:  CrankyMan [ Sat May 18, 2002 9:16 am ]
Post subject: 

Captain RibMan


LOS ANGELES (Wireless Flash) -- "Star Wars "fans everywhere are praising George Lucas for limiting Jar Jar Binks' scenes in "Episode II," but one "Star Wars" fan is stepping up to defend the hated Gungan.

John Sprengelmeyer -- who calls himself "Jar Jar's Johnnie Cochran" -- says the reason movie-goers hate Jar Jar is because they don't understand their "erotic feelings" for him.

Sprengelmeyer, co-creator of the comic strip "Captain RibMan (," says folks have hidden, unresolved sexual feelings for sexy Jar Jar -- which wasn't helped any by "Star Wars'" franchising suggestive gummy Jar Jar Binks candy tongues.

But Jar Jar's biggest fan thinks the character's dangerous sexuality is great, second only to his "...brilliant animation, memorable voice and clever personality that merges Bob Marley and Carrot Top."

Author:  aDam [ Sat May 18, 2002 11:27 am ]
Post subject: 

But... Jar Jar has no genitals.

Author:  Batmantis [ Sun May 19, 2002 6:33 am ]
Post subject: 

You looked down there?

Author:  aDam [ Sun May 19, 2002 11:07 am ]
Post subject: 

No... and yes.

In ep 1 he gets kicked in the crotch by a droid when in Watto's shop and doesn't flinch.

Also I browsed through this sort of illustrated guide to ep 2 and there were naked Gungans sketches with no genitals.

I bet a Gungan's idea of hot sex is to have the chick lay some eggs and then have the guy cover them in him semen.

Author:  Vindicator [ Thu May 30, 2002 9:59 pm ]
Post subject: 

Isn't that everyone's idea?

Author:  aDam [ Fri May 31, 2002 8:21 am ]
Post subject: 

Cover the eggs, not the chick.

Author:  street547 [ Tue Dec 13, 2005 6:42 am ]
Post subject:  unethical

Is that not a bit unethical ;-) of yourself?

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group