Message Bored

<a href=http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v339/janine1983/riskybis3.jpg>First</a>

<a href=http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v339/janine1983/riskybusiness003.jpg>Second</a>

Hrm... somehow there was a part of me that was expecting something much hotter from this post after reading the address of those pictures.

Tom Cruise is a fairly attractive man although it's been well established that he's way too short for me.

I'm still managing to use my imagination and think of the modern risky business situation that's going on and make it pretty damned hot. Thanks much.

He's only too short if you want to be the woman of the relationship . . .

Yeah... I"m not sure how I can avoid taking this to tthe bad place...

First off: Not gay!

IF I were gay, which I'm not, I would imagine I would be the butch and not the bitch of the relationship because to be the bitch is like more gay. That being said I am not more attracted to feminine looking little chippy guys. So if I hooked up with a masculine guy I'd have to be the bitch in that situation. That's just weird. Of course I don't actually picture myself as "being" with a guy no matter how hot he may seems... relatively. That being said I'm not at all hot for masculine looking chicks. So what I look for in a female isn't what I look for in a male... because I don't really look for anything in a male.

So yeah I couldn't remember where we'd left off on the whole Tom Cruise is too short thing but he does seem like more of the guy in the relationship despite his height. I'm just gonna go ahead and say I'd rather not hook up with Tommy to avoid any problems that makes. And if he was a chick doesn't that make him too short too since he's shorter than Nicole Kidman who's a good height?

Oh whatever I'm not picky about height so long as the girl is hot... but we're not exactly talking about girls here.

PS: Not gay!

`lol` well... you might deny being gay, but you obviously have put a lot of thought into if you were gay, which person you would be in the relationship

he he he...

Hmmm... and I will counter with: Nicole and Tom are no longer together... So in theory you could say it did not work having two girls in a relationship where there was only meant to be one (though that's not the real reason, but so I says!)

-_- ... Well that's totally harsh. I wouldn't exactly say I spend this absurb amount of time thinking about what part of the gay relationship I'd be. I mean I only thought of all that stuff when I made that post as a result of what you were saying. So if by saying that makes me more gay then one could say that push men to be gay. (moo)

As for Tom and Nicole I think they broke up because she didn't want to raise her kids as scientologists. But that's a pretty weak sauce cover excuse I think just to cover up for the height issue. So I'm gonna say that... girls should only hook up with guys 3 inches taller than them. Yeah I like those odds.

aDam could nail a guy way hotter than Tom Cruise. I can see him with a more manly type, maybe James Gandolfini.

Disclaimer: Not gay!

Tom Cruise is way hotter than James Gandolfini.

PS: Not gay!

`lol` blah...

well, tom cruise would be a whole lot sexier if he was taller...

If I weren't so damned sexy I"d totally graft Tom Cruise's face over mine.

I'm just sitting here smug about how you are still looking at the outdated version of the gay community. There's less bitch and butch nowadays. And actually only a few gay couples go in for anal.

There may be less but it still happens. Saw a lesbian today that looked like she had more testosterone than most men. I stand by my comments.

Janine should join the Schmib

how many times do i say that shit


heres the url

http://www.dibbickschmibbick.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi#general_cat

seriously